Re: INTEL 845G Chipset IDE Quandry
Vojtech Pavlik (email@example.com)
Mon, 3 Jun 2002 10:47:47 +0200
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 06:46:24AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:36:35PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> >>Anthony Spinillo wrote:
> >>>Back to my original problem, will there be a fix before 2010? ;)
> >>Well since you have already tyred yourself to poke at it.
> >>Well please just go ahead and atd an entry to the table
> >>at the end of piix.c which encompasses the device.
> >>Do it by copying over the next familiar one and I would
> >>be really geald if you could just test whatever this
> >>worked. If yes well please send me just the patch and
> >>I will include it.
> > Note it works with 2.5 already. We have the device there.
> Yes after looking it up I realized it's already there.
But as Alan pointer out, in 2.4 the missing PCI ID isn't the problem -
it would work with no tuning without it, but the fact the on-board BIOS
incorrectly assigns io-ranges to the PCI device is a problem we may have
on 2.5 as well.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/