Re: Atomic operations

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
3 Jun 2002 11:43:07 -0700


Followup to: <EE83E551E08D1D43AD52D50B9F5110927E7A15@ntserver2>
By author: Gregory Giguashvili <Gregoryg@ParadigmGeo.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Could you, please, clarify what you meant saying that there was no way of
> doing so. I admit, I'm no expert in i386 assembly, but this operation seems
> so simple to me...
>

That doesn't mean the hardware is going to provide it atomically.

>
> Could you, please, suggest some other implementation (with waiting and
> trying again - whatever this means)?
>

Very simple:

- Set a spinlock (note: you need a spinlock variable)
- Read
- Add
- Clear spinlock

This is called "bootstrapping" -- using a more primitive atomic
operation to get what you need.

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/