Re: please kindly get back to me

Matti>   Best technologies (as I see them, but I am not omniscient, of
Matti>   course) are those that do scoring.  E.g. naving some word NN
Matti>   might not alone be considered spam-signature, but it might
Matti>   increase score, and once the score exceeds arbitrary treshold
Matti>   (lower with short messages?), the message is considered spam,
Matti>   and rejected.

I've been really really happy with spamassassin (www.spamassissin.org)
for my personal inbox.  It's been blocking about 90+% of the spam
right out of the box, and only three or four false positives.  

It's nice since it pre-filters SPAM out, so you can handle the rejects
at your leisure, and not have to deal with them randomly.  I've been
very happy with it, and only after a week of use.

I've average around 20-40 spam a-day, so it's made a measureable
difference.

John
   John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies
	 [e-mail] - http://www.lucent.com - 978-399-0479