Re: ptrace vs /proc

Pradeep Padala (ppadala@cise.ufl.edu)
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:08:40 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Frank Davis: "[PATCH] 2.5.24 : tr_source_route undefined fix"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] scheduler bits from 2.5.23-dj1"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: ptrace vs /proc"

> There is no such interface in Linux and currently no plans to develop a
> Solaris-style /proc.

I would like to develop such interface. Is it Ok if I go ahead and send a
patch. I have been playing with ptrace in the kernel for a while.

> Some work that may go into 2.5, task ornaments, may facilitate easier
> debugging and perhaps make such a /proc more feasible in the future.

What are task ornaments? Can you elaborate on this?

TIA
--pradeep

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Frank Davis: "[PATCH] 2.5.24 : tr_source_route undefined fix"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [patch] scheduler bits from 2.5.23-dj1"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: ptrace vs /proc"