I don't need to. As I said in the following paragraph, I never claimed such
a thing existed. I am only complaining about your generalisations which to
me imply that an alternative better interface cannot and could not exist.
Which is a pile of crap. Maybe tomorrow someone will come up with a much
better interface/drive. That is all I am saying. You cannot see into the
future to be able to make such generalisations...
> >Note: I am not saying that there is an alternative interface or anything
> >like that... just that your statement is fallacious.
>Your statements just proove that you didn't try to get the background
>that is needed to find a useful and seminal future development.
WHAT?!? Get off your high horse, will you? I never claimed anything to
prompt this response. I am just telling you off for misleading people with
Anton, who is starting to get pissed off with Mr Joerg "I know everything"
-- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown-- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/