> Really, there is little reason to worry; my contribution to the
> development of 2.5 (and a forthcoming 2.6/2.7/2.8/...) would probably
> not be much larger were I to drop maintenance of the 2.0-tree. Possibly,
> Marcello and Linus would receive a few more odd fixes for typos and
> the Config-files, and maybe some MCA-related fixes, but as things stand
> right now, the fact that I only have a dialup-connection stands between
> me and serious development (<subliminal message>anyone care to sponsor a
> faster connection or hire me?</subliminal message>)
Out of curiousity, just what will UML run? Can you run 2.0 kernels under
UML? Older than that? Your mention about the pain of upgrading strikes
home.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/