Re: [patch 1/13] minimal rmap
Daniel Phillips (email@example.com)
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 22:46:15 +0200
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 22:42, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 13:37, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > I don't agree with this, for a very simple reason.
> > The current rmap patch was created in order to change the
> > VM behaviour as little as possible and ONLY provide an
> > infrastructure. Benchmarking a completely untuned thing
> > that was built to not change anything is bound to give
> > meaningless results.
> > I say we _use_ the infrastructure that akpm is trying to
> > get merged now in order to implement something useful.
> I do agree with Rik here. Once the basic rmap infrastructure is merged
> we need to work on implementing stuff on top of it or else there is no
Well then we all agree, because that's just what I said.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/