Re: Dual BSD/GPL [ was: Re: Generic modules documentation is

[Alan Cox]

On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 07:56, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> 
> 	* According to Alan Cox, a license of "BSD without advertisement
> 	clause" is not a suitable free software license. This license type
> 	allows binary only modules without source code. Any modules in the
> 	kernel tarball with this license should really be "Dual BSD/GPL".

The problem with just the BSD tag is that means it might be binary only
so undebuggable. If its dual BSD/GPL then at the least the user can
demand their GPL rights and get the source to debug it

I think all these are now sorted