> > i agree mostly, but i do not agree with __irq_save() and irq_save().
> > What's wrong with "flags_t irq_save_off()" - the name carries the proper
> > meaning, and it also harmonizes with irq_off().
>
> but not with irq_restore :) maybe irq_restore_on() although the on
> is implicit.
no, the on is not implicit at all. If you restore into a disabled state
then it will go from on to off.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/