Re: is flock broken in 2.4 or 2.5 kernels or what does this mean?

dank@kegel.com
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:31:21 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruption in 2.5.27?]"
Previous message: Martin Brulisauer: "RE: kbuild 2.5.26 - arch/alpha"
Maybe in reply to: John Covici: "is flock broken in 2.4 or 2.5 kernels or what does this mean?"
Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: is flock broken in 2.4 or 2.5 kernels or what does this mean?"

dank@kegel.com wrote:
>
> To save others a bit of searching:
> the original thread was 'broken flock()' on 28 June 2002.
>
> Steven's post and regression test:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102562226210792&w=2
> Matthew Wilcox's rip-it-out patch:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=102562469813922&w=2

See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59992
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] irqlock patch -G3. [was Re: odd memory corruption in 2.5.27?]"
Previous message: Martin Brulisauer: "RE: kbuild 2.5.26 - arch/alpha"
Maybe in reply to: John Covici: "is flock broken in 2.4 or 2.5 kernels or what does this mean?"
Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: is flock broken in 2.4 or 2.5 kernels or what does this mean?"