Re: CPU detection broken in 2.5.27?

[Mikael Pettersson]

On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:08:52 -0700 (PDT), Patrick Mochel wrote:
>> I meant ->x86_model there, I assume you did too, and you have a 0xF24/0xF27 cpu.
>> I wasn't aware these were HT aware. In fact, only 0xF50 are confirmed.
>> Interesting.
>
>Actually, it's Family 15, Model 1, Stepping 2. Though the HT capability
>shows up, it's disabled, so it's one of the pre-Foster P4s (though I don't
>know what they're called).

cpuid 0xF12 is a standard Willamette core P4; I have one heating my room :-)
Model 2 should be Northwood, AFAIK.

But why the table? Aren't you using the extended cpuid levels and/or the
BrandID to get the names for cpuid 0x680 (coppermine) and above cpus?

/Mikael