Re: n_tty.c driver patch (semantic and performance correction) (a

[Alan Cox]

On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 03:34, Robert White wrote:
> Having virtually every user on the planet realize this and just set VMIN == 1 
> is an fairly telling indicator.
> 
> Repeatedly calling the kernel to assemble an input buffer which is necessary 
> if VMIN ==1, is dumb.

VMIN was basically invented for communication protocols when you know
the block length that should arrive within a given timeout. Its pretty
much essential on old old boxes and was very important for
interrupt/context switch reduction when doing block transfers. In that
world the read blocks or in O_NDELAY returns -EAGAIN (0 in old SYS5)
until the data block is big enough to warrant its copying. Similarly
poll has no business saying data is ready until a large enough block is.

When talking to a human setting VMIN > 1 makes no sense anyway. In fact
nowdays it makes even less sense than it did before because of the use
of UTF8 encodings for unicode characters.