Re: inlines in kernel/sched.c

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Sun, 28 Jul 2002 18:36:58 -0300 (BRT)


On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Ingo, could you please review the use of inlines in the
> > scheduler sometime? They seem to be excessive.
> >
> > For example, this patch reduces the sched.d icache footprint
> > by 1.5 kilobytes.
>
> the patch also hurts context-switch latencies - it went
> from 1.35 usecs to 1.42 usecs - a 5% drop.

That's 140 cpu cycles on a 2 GHz CPU, probably less time than
what a single cache miss would cost for non-scheduler-intensive
workloads.

This would mean that for a workload which is doing real work,
and pushes the scheduler out of the L1 cache, the slowdown
would be a lot more simply due to the extra cache misses the
extra inlines generate.

regards,

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/