Re: manipulating sigmask from filesystems and drivers

Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 12:00:40 -0400

On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 08:39:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> We already do this right, and there is no reason to _break_ the fact that
> we do it right. Can you come up with a _single_ reason for why we should
> break existing standardized binary interfaces?

Personally, I think that uninterruptible file io is good, but there needs
to be an upper limit to the maximum size of the io. As it stands today,
someone can do a single multigigabyte read or write that is completely
uninterruptible (even to kill -9), but could take a minute or more to
complete.

-ben

-- 
"You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/