Re: Just cosmethic but...

[J.A. Magallon]

On 20020805 DervishD wrote:
>     Hi all :)
> 
>     The output of 'cat /proc/meminfo' is ugly by today standards,
> since is very frequent having more than 99 Mb of RAM and the current
> meminfo just supports 8 digits before outputting ugly tabulations.
> 
>     So, how about raising that 8 digits to at least 10, thus allowing
> pretty tabulations up to 9 Gb of RAM?
> 

Why 10 ?
    unsigned long k32= ~0;
    unsigned long long k64 = ~0;
    printf("%d %lu\n",sizeof(k32)*8,k32);
    printf("%d %llu\n",sizeof(k64)*8,k64);

gives

32 4294967295
64 18446744073709551615

On a 64 bit box you could have 2^64 bytes.
Opps, and on a 32bit box you could have 16Gb of swap ?
1Tb is:
    unsigned long long k64 = 1ULL<<40;
64 1099511627776

13 digits (nice number ;))

Sorry, late at night here...

-- 
J.A. Magallon                           \                 Software is like sex:
junk.able.es                             \           It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.0 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.19-jam0 (gcc 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.0 3.2-0.2mdk))