Re: [PATCH] trivial patch for 2.4.20-pre1 8139too.c driver

Russell, Nathaniel (reddog83@chartermi.net)
Tue, 06 Aug 2002 15:28:56 -0400


O K Then

Russell, Nathaniel wrote:
>My i ask what the sense is to not remove the dead code if
> all we are trying to do is stablize the 2.4x kernel
series
> and not add extra code or change around the drivers for
> perticular hardware. The code is not used anymore so why
> keep it in the 2.4x series. The code can stay in the 2.5x
> series no problem because there we can change drivers
> rewrite hardware protocalls and tthings like that.

...because I maintain the driver, and want to keep that
code around as a note to myself.

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/