Re: [PATCH] [2.5] asm-generic/atomic.h and changes to arm, parisc,

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
09 Aug 2002 01:11:11 +0100


On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 23:40, Luca Barbieri wrote:
> > The compiler can cache the value in a register
> It shouldn't since it is volatile and the machine has instructions with
> memory operands.

I'm curious what part of C99 guarantees that it must generate

add 1 to memory

not

load memory
add 1
store memory

It certainly guarantees not to cache it for use next statement, but does
it actually persuade the compiler to use direct operations on memory ?

I'm not a C99 language lawyer but genuinely curious

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/