Re: klibc development release

Rob Landley (landley@trommello.org)
Sun, 11 Aug 2002 01:02:11 -0400


On Friday 09 August 2002 04:22 pm, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> >>klibc is a tiny C library subset intended to be integrated into the
> >>kernel source tree and being used for initramfs stuff. Thus,
> >>initramfs+rootfs can be used to move things that are currently in
> >>kernel space, such as ip autoconfiguration or nfsroot (in fact,
> >>mounting root in general) into user space.
> >
> > Could I link 4-clause BSD source against this?
> > (the GPL is incompatible with the 4-clause BSD license)
>
> I'm planning to release this under a BSD-like license, such as 3-clause
> BSD, MIT or the X license. I'm still looking at each of those.

What's wrong with LGPL? I thought libraries were what it was originally
intended for. (Is 4 clause BSD incompatable with LGPL?)

Yeah, I know stallman's decided to hate. I'm sure he'd be happy to know that
stance encourages stuff to be released BSD-ish instead. :)

Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/