Re: pte_chain leak in rmap code (2.5.31)

[Rik van Riel]

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:

> Note the strange use of continue and break which both achieve the same!
> What was meant to happen (judging from rmap-13c) is that we break
> out of the for-Loop once SWAP_FAIL or SWAP_ERROR is returned from
> try_to_unmap_one. However, this doesn't happen and a subsequent call
> to pte_chain_free will use the wrong value for prev_pc.

Excellent hunting!   Thank you!

Your fix should work too, although in my opinion it's a
little bit too subtle, so I've changed it into:

	                                case SWAP_FAIL:
                                        ret = SWAP_FAIL;
                                        goto give_up;
                                case SWAP_ERROR:
                                        ret = SWAP_ERROR;
                                        goto give_up;
                        }
                }
give_up:

This is going into 2.4-rmap and 2.5 right now.

thanks,

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/