John Weber (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 19:17:03 -0400
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 11:11:14PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov escreveu:
>>At 20:56 17/08/02, Alan Cox wrote:
>>>Volunteers willing to run Cerberus test sets on 2.4 boxes with IDE
>>>controllers would also be much appreciated. That way we can get good
>>>coverage tests and catch badness immediately
>>If you tell me the kernel version and patches to apply which you want
>>tested, and what options to run cerberus with (never used it before...), I
>>have control over a currently idle dual Athlon MP 2000+ with an AMD-768
>>(rev 04) IDE controller and 3G of RAM. It has only one HD, a ST340810A
>>(ATA-100, 37G) attached.
> I have a dual p100 with a CMD640 so I'll test 2.4-ac or whatever you name it,
> as soon as I get back from vacation (in two weeks) and I get another old disk
> for this test machine. It behaves with 2.4 but loses a lot of interrupts with
> 2.5-MD (haven't tested after Jens got 2.4 forward port into 2.5).
I have a dual Ppro200 with a PIIX ide chip, and a PIII 866 with a VIA
686B. I'll test anything you want on these boxes.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/