> well, this means that we'd still have to iterate through both lists in
> wait4(), and we'd have to maintain the ptrace list(s) in all the relevant
> codepaths - does this buy us anything relative to -B4?
The lists would constitute the tasks that wait4() should consider, at
least. And maintaining the list wouldn't be any more work than the
current reparenting. I do admit that I don't see a significant win,
codewise, other than aesthetics.
In looking at the code I was wondering something. What happens to the real
parent of a ptraced task when it calls wait4()? If that's its only child,
won't it return ECHILD?
Dave McCracken IBM Linux Base Kernel Team 1-512-838-3059
firstname.lastname@example.org T/L 678-3059
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/