> > Actually Rusty what's the big deal, add an "initializer"
> > arg to the macro. It doesn't hurt anyone, it doesn't lose
> > any space in the kernel image, and the macro arg reminds
> > people to do it.
> >
> > I think it's a small price to pay to keep a longer range
> > of compilers supported :-)
>
> I disagree. They might not have a convenient (static) initializer, in
> which case it's simply cruel and unusual, to work around an obscure
> compiler bug.
Ugh? of course it will always have convient initializer, namely zero.
Pavel
-- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/