>On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 09:22:22PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>I think I prefer that we implement a repacker for reiser4 though, as
>>that, combined with delayed allocation, will be a balanced and thorough
>>solution.
>>
>>
>
>How does current ReiserFS fare against extreme fragmentation? What
>about XFS? Without trying to risk a flamewar, what Linux filesystems
>are the most preventive of fragmentation?
>
>The filesystem could make a huge difference on a machine like a mail
>server...
>
>
>
>
Sometimes it is best to confess that one does not have the expertise
appropriate for answering a question. Someone on our mailing list
studied it carefully though. Perhaps they can comment.
Hans
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/