Re: LMbench2.0 results

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Sun, 08 Sep 2002 01:25:26 -0700 (PDT)


From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 01:28:21 -0700

But if this were truly the issue, the allocation and deallocation
overhead for pagetables should show up as additional pressure
against zone->lock.

The big gain is not only that allocation/free is cheap, also
page table entries tend to hit in cpu cache for even freshly
allocated page tables.

I think that is the bit that would show up in the mmap lmbench
test.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/