> It passes all of our testing, but it is the kind of code that is more
> likely than most to have elusive lurking bugs. It cannot be tested in
> 2.5 first because 2.5 is too broken at this particular moment.
What in particular holds you back from testing this in 2.5 ?
This seems quite dubious for inclusion first in what it supposed
to be the stable series.
Dave
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/