Re: XFS?

[Alan Cox]

On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 16:12, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> More to the point, a quick scan of LKML will show that there are fixes for
> ext3 and reisser on a regular basis, so one must assume that they don't
> always work as they should either. XFS is in a number of distributions,
> and is stable for users.

Thats never been the big concern. The problem has always been that XFS
was very invasive code so it might break stuff for people who dont
choose to use experimental xfs stuff. Thats slowly improving