Re: 2.4.19 SCSI core bug?

Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:42:01 +0100

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:39:23AM -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> I have a cleanup patch for 2.5 scsi_error I will add this fix in.
> scsi_send_eh_cmnd should not be retrying the command it should return to
> the caller the status and let them decide. We also should create a
> ?restore_scsi_cb? function that is shared so that it is done
> consistently.

I've got a patch for both of these now. I'm working through some other
issues at the moment though (like, why the hell requests for sectors
after the sector in error don't have a data phase, and the drive returns
status = GOOD, message = COMMAND COMPLETE, leading the kernel to believe
that it did transfer data.)

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/