On 13 Sep 2002, Robert Love wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 03:36, Robert Love wrote:
> Actually, looking at this again, we probably want to still BUG() if
> in_interrupt() but _not_ if in_atomic().
- if (unlikely(in_atomic()))
- BUG();
+ if (unlikely((in_interrupt() || (!in_atomic())) && preempt_count() != PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERROR "schedule() called while non-atomic, or in interrupt!\n");
+ show_stack(NULL);
+ }
?
Thunder
-- --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .- --/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..- .- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.- --./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/