Re: System response benchmarks in performance patches

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:22:54 -0300 (BRT)


On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:

> I came up with a very simple way of measuring responsiveness that gives
> me numbers that are meaningful to me. What I've done is the old faithful
> kernel compile and measured it under different loads to simulate the
> pc's ability to perform under various loads.

Absolutely wonderful. I'd love to see this easily scriptable
so we can just run it with one command, eg:

$ ./contest

> Kernel Time %CPU
> 2.4.19 3:00.76 58%
> 2.4.19-ck7 2:01.68 86%
> 2.4.19-ck7-rmap 2:05.95 83%
> 2.4.18-6mdk 3:01.48 58%

Very interesting results. People benchmarking just one thing
at a time won't get variances anywhere near this big, while
real system workload is pretty much always multitasking.

I think I've finally found a benchmark that gives results which
are meaningful in the context of a multitasking system.

regards,

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/