Re: [patch] readv/writev rework

[Andrew Morton]

Hirokazu Takahashi wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I fixed the patch.

Thanks again.

> But I have one more question.
> 
> Please consider...
> while a process sleep in copy_*_user() another one may call kmap_atomic
> and kunmap_atomic. And the process will restart and might access the
> wrong page as kunmap_atomic do nothing without CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM flag.
> I mean it wouldn't any faults as another page is still kmapped.

Yes; this is why it is illegal to sleep, or to switch CPUs by any means
while holding an atomic kmap:

	kmap_atomic(...);
	__copy_*_user(...);
	kunmap_atomic(...);

the kmap_atomic() will increment the preempt count (even on CONFIG_PREEMPT=n).

- The incremented preempt count pins this code path onto this CPU
  while the kmap is held. (This is only relevant to CONFIG_PREEMPT=y)

- The incremented preempt count tells do_page_fault() that we cannot
  handle a pagefault; if a fault is encountered during the copy_*_user(),
  do_page_fault() will arrange for the __copy_*_user() to return a short
  copy.

So.  The code path is atomic, and is pinned to a single CPU.  The atomic
kmap pool uses a different batch of virtual addresses for each CPU (it's
a per-CPU pool of addresses).