Re: FW: 2.5.34: IR __FUNCTION__ breakage

Bjoern A. Zeeb (bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net)
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:10:14 +0200 (CEST)


On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:

Hi,

> > Also, specifically relating to varargs macros as described above, you
> > can certainly have a varargs macro with zero args, just look at C99
> > varargs macros...
>
> I remember that it didn't work. Ok, I'll try again.

if I remember corretly with C99 if you do s.th. like this (simple
sample):

#define LOG(level, format, ...) \
log(level, format, ##__VA_ARGS__);

you _need_ to give an argument:

LOG(debug, "blah", 0);

w/o the ", 0" this is an error.

There have been gcc extentions that allow(ed) zero arguments.

*searching*

See: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Variadic-Macros.html

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb				bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74				http://www.zabbadoz.net/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/