> > > Also, specifically relating to varargs macros as described above, you
> > > can certainly have a varargs macro with zero args, just look at C99
> > > varargs macros...
> >
> > I remember that it didn't work. Ok, I'll try again.
>
> if I remember corretly with C99 if you do s.th. like this (simple
> sample):
>
> #define LOG(level, format, ...) \
> log(level, format, ##__VA_ARGS__);
No, this is only valid C99 if __VA_ARGS__ is the empty list.
I posted the correct way to write this macro about a week ago that
works with all versions of GCC (and follows their documented
behaviour; this stuff *is* all documented).
Neil.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/