Re: [2.5.38] file_lock_cache leak

William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:08:52 -0700


On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:14:31AM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
> I was wondering why my box was getting slower and slower... :)
> I'm running galeon, mutt, rxvts, etc... Nothing very special.
> file_lock_cache 1568120 1568120 96 39203 39203 1 : 252 126

I'm seeing unusual file_lock space consumption here as well. I think
after running bk (which may exercise it) the memory becomes immortal.

The usual tiobench run:
buffer_head: 149047KB 149047KB 100.0
file_lock_cache: 50818KB 50818KB 100.0
ext2_inode_cache: 41599KB 41603KB 99.99
task_struct: 27433KB 27433KB 100.0
radix_tree_node: 23498KB 23498KB 100.0
names_cache: 22368KB 22372KB 99.98
dentry_cache: 2327KB 9026KB 25.78
vm_area_struct: 3510KB 3510KB 100.0
size-1024: 3406KB 3468KB 98.21
biovec-64: 2534KB 3206KB 79.4

Cheers,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/