Re: alloc_skb cannot be called with GFP_DMA

Manfred Spraul (manfred@colorfullife.com)
Thu, 26 Sep 2002 23:18:58 +0200


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010908070304080801020709
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[ok, I admit that this doesn't qualify as a timely reply]

Andrea wrote on Sun, 5 Aug 2001 17:53:34 +0200
>
> I think it's good idea to apply this patch to mainline:
>
> --- 2.4.8pre4aa1/mm/slab.c.~1~ Sun Aug 5 16:46:58 2001
> +++ 2.4.8pre4aa1/mm/slab.c Sun Aug 5 17:44:09 2001
> @@ -1172,7 +1172,6 @@
>
> static inline void kmem_cache_alloc_head(kmem_cache_t *cachep, int flags)
> {
> -#if DEBUG
> if (flags & SLAB_DMA) {
> if (!(cachep->gfpflags & GFP_DMA))
> BUG();
> @@ -1180,7 +1179,6 @@
> if (cachep->gfpflags & GFP_DMA)
> BUG();
> }
> -#endif
> }
>
> static inline void * kmem_cache_alloc_one_tail (kmem_cache_t *cachep,
>
> This will trap anybody trying calling alloc_skb using GFP_DMA, that
> usage is illegal, it would work by luck only if _everybody_ calling
> alloc_skb would be passing GFP_DMA too (because the gfp_mask is passed
> to the GFP in order to get right things like GFP_WAIT) which is
> obviously not the case as the skb cache is shared by everybody.

If someone calls alloc_skb(GFP_DMA), then he wants the data buffer in
DMA space, noone does DMA to/from the skb structure fields. The right
approach is to mask the GFP_DMA bit before calling
kmem_cache_alloc(skbuff_head_cache), and to forward the bit to the
kmalloc of the skb data buffer. This is in 2.4.20-pre5, the right fix.

The check was indended to catch a feature that is present in the 2.2
slab allocator, but missing in 2.4: In 2.2, it was possible to create a
custom cachep with kmem_cache_create(), and then allocate some objects
with GFP_DMA set, some without GFP_DMA set. The allocator in 2.4/5
doesn't support that anymore.

But something else is wrong in kmem_cache_alloc_head - the common error,
GFP_WAIT allocation from interrupt, is not checked - neither in DEBUG
nor without DEBUG.

What about the attached patch?
- put the GFP_DMA test again under DEBUG: GFP_DMA errors are virtually
impossible by design.
- add an in_interrupt() check into alloc_head()

I've put the in_interrupt() check under DEBUG, too: It's icache
pollution, and the second test in kmem_cache_grow() will catch abusers
sooner or later.

--
	Manfred

--------------010908070304080801020709 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-slab-debug" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-slab-debug"

--- 2.5/mm/slab.c Sun Sep 22 06:25:17 2002 +++ build-2.5/mm/slab.c Thu Sep 26 23:02:40 2002 @@ -1259,6 +1259,13 @@ static inline void kmem_cache_alloc_head(kmem_cache_t *cachep, int flags) { +#if DEBUG + /* check if someone calls us from interrupt with GFP_WAIT set + * With debug disabled, this only happens in kmem_cache_grow, + * to reduce the critical path length. + */ + if (in_interrupt() && (flags & __GFP_WAIT)) + BUG(); if (flags & SLAB_DMA) { if (!(cachep->gfpflags & GFP_DMA)) BUG(); @@ -1266,6 +1273,7 @@ if (cachep->gfpflags & GFP_DMA) BUG(); } +#endif } static inline void * kmem_cache_alloc_one_tail (kmem_cache_t *cachep,

--------------010908070304080801020709--

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/