Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice

Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:17:34 +0200 (CEST)


On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Tomas Szepe wrote:

> > Technically correct. Major version jump should be made when there is
> > a binary incompatibility. It can be made without, but it is usually
> > done for marketing reasons. I hope we'll never have marketing reasons
> > for lk. :-) We can be actually _proud_ to have 2.$BIGNUM instead of
> > 3.0
>
> ... and go Solaris, as in 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 7, 8, 9. :D

NetBSD still has sane version numbers: :-)

0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6

> T.

cu
Adrian

-- 

You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/