Re: [patch] Workqueue Abstraction, 2.5.40-H7

Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:53:39 +0000 (UTC)


In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210011210030.1878-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> wrote:
>
>Pease don't introduce more typedefs. They only hide what the hell the
>thing is, which is actively _bad_ for structures, since passing a
>structure by value etc is something that should never be done, for
>example.

Btw, just to avoid counter-examples: Linux does use structures and
typedefs occasionally to hide and force compiler typechecking on small
structures on purpose. We have a few places where we do things like

typedef struct {
unsigned int value;
} atomic_t;

(and similar things for the page table entries etc).

This is done because the things are often really regular scalars, but we
use the structure as a strict type checking mechanism. In this case,
using a typedef is fine, because we don't actually ever want to _access_
it as a structure, and the typedef provices exactly the kind of
information hiding that we need.

But type hiding for a real structure just doesn't make sense, since we
use it as a true structure, and hiding information just makes it harder
to see.

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/