> The memory management issues would qualify for 3.0, but my argument
> there is really that I doubt everybody really is happy yet.
I'm absolutely convinced some people won't be happy, simply
because of the fundamental limitations of global page replacement.
However, Andrew Morton has done a great job and the 2.5 VM seems
to be looking as good as anything we've had before.
For me 3.0 arguments would be Ingo's threading stuff, not anything
else.
regards,
Rik
-- A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/