Re: O(1) Scheduler from Ingo vs. O(1) Scheduler from Robert

[Robert Love]

On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:28, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> On 4 Oct 2002, Robert Love wrote:
> 
> > There should _not_ be other things in the patch aside from the
> > scheduler. [...]
> 
> hm, i remember there was some 'set max RT priority in .config' stuff
> in it, isnt that the case anymore?

Oh, yes, indeed.  I forgot about that.

Since we cleaned up the whole MAX_PRIO thing the only main difference in
my tree is that fact it is exported as a CONFIG setting (and the logic
to implement a new ffs if BITMAP_SIZE changes).

Otherwise the trees aim to be in-sync.

	Robert Love