This is true, but the major problem comes of upgrading and compatibility
issues with old versions of LVM, etc. The usual stuff, IMHO.
> >>>You can see who around here has maintained kernel code and who hasnt.
> >>>You don't want a substitute in the mean time, because then you have to
> >>>get rid of it
> >>
> >>Like LVM ;)
> >
> >
> > Not quite...
>
> Well, existing LVM does appear to be a subsitute for a better solution
> (dm or EVMS) for which it's time has come to be removed.
I'm not sure what you're saying here. EVMS is good, but I believe that
LVM and EVMS serve two different purposes, mainly with regard to the
type of environments each is used in.
I've attempted to contact Heinz twice, I hope he responds about this
soon. I like LVM for it's simplicity, and ease of use. Simple tools, and
methods that get the job done.
> ~mc
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/