Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not

Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:55:42 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tim Hockin: "unused code? include/linux/nfsiod.h"
Previous message: Gigi Duru: "Re: The end of embedded Linux?"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Next in thread: Charles Cazabon: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"

On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> >
> > Sure. The mey is:
> ^^^ <---- "bet" ?

Yeah. What the heck happened to my fingers?

Linus "spastic" Torvalds

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tim Hockin: "unused code? include/linux/nfsiod.h"
Previous message: Gigi Duru: "Re: The end of embedded Linux?"
In reply to: Daniel Phillips: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Next in thread: Charles Cazabon: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"