Re: New BK License Problem?

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Tue, 08 Oct 2002 15:20:56 -0700 (PDT)


From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:24:44 +0100

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:15:20PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

> How about
> bk-commits-head
> bk-commits-2.4
>
> then later bk-commits-2.6 etc...

How about 'stable' and 'devel', then we won't have to worry
about renaming/resubscribing when we switch revisions.

I expect people to maintain 2.4.x even when 2.6.x is
"stable" even once 2.7.x has begun.

Therefore, I like your first idea the best.

Ok?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/