Re: [bk/patch] driver model update: device_unregister()

[Linus Torvalds]

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> 
> > I think that is a valid argument as long as it's called "driverfs" or
> > something, but since the thing is clearly evolving into a "kernelfs"  
> 
> BTW, is that the name you prefer, and will you take the patch? 

I do know that "kfs" is too much of a random collection of consonants.  
Looks like something out of an IBM architecture manual. "kernelfs" is more
acceptable, I think, but it's not perfect either - it's a bit too generic.  
Isn't /proc a kernelfs too? But I can't come up with anything better..

		Linus