Re: Fork timing numbers for shared page tables

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 02:59:07PM -0500, Dave McCracken wrote:
> I ran this test in three cases, 2.5.41, 2.5.41-mm2 without share, and
> 2.5.41-mm2 with share.
> Now for the results (all times are in ms):

Hrm, it'd be nice to see how nicely this does things for things like
500GB-sized processes on 64-bit boxen...

Any chance you could pass this test along for randomized benchmark
type stuff?

Thanks,
Bill