Re: Watchdog drivers

Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:20:58 +0100

On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:35:38AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> davej@codemonkey.org.uk said:
> > They remain character devices, so drivers/char/watchdog/ gets my
> > vote. Any nay-sayers ?
>
> By that logic, we should have only drivers/{net,char,block}.

Suits me 8-)
Though a drivers/bus/ would make sense too for things like pci, sbus,
and friends, but that kind of thing can wait until 2.7 I think 8-)
To get back to the point, drivers/ seems cluttered, and as the
objective is decluttering drivers/char/ removing a dozen files, and
replacing them with a single directory in that dir just seems better
than adding an extra dir in drivers/ to me, but then again, I could
be out of my tiny little mind.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/