Re: uml-patch-2.5.42-1

[Jeff Dike]

[e-mail] said:
> Below is quotes from the patch, and at the very end of the message
> there is a my proposed patch to fix all uncovered problems, patch was
> tested as in "compiles and runs ok for me". 

Correct on all counts.  Nice spotting.

> Also there are number "32" is hardcoded into arch/um/kernel/
> trap_user.c in some arrays, taht you probably actually want to make
> dependent on CONFIG_NR_CPUS 

The problem is that trap_user.c is a userspace file and has no access to
config.h.  The hardcoded 32 is nasty and needs fixing, but I haven't decided
how to do that yet.

				Jeff