Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5

Dan Kegel (dank@kegel.com)
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:18:35 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: unhappy with current.h"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Maybe in reply to: Shailabh Nagar: "[PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Next in thread: Shailabh Nagar: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"

Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:06:22AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Doesn't the F_SETSIG/F_SETOWN/SIGIO stuff qualify as a scalable
> > alternative?
>
> No.

What's the worst part about it? The use of the signal queue?
- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: unhappy with current.h"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Maybe in reply to: Shailabh Nagar: "[PATCH] async poll for 2.5"
Next in thread: Shailabh Nagar: "Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5"