Re: [PATCH] Summit support for 2.5 - now with subarch! [4/5]

[Martin J. Bligh]

>> That's pretty pointless for one variable. I think you're taking things
>> to ridiculous extremes.
> 
> OK, I agree that a single .c file for one variable is very extreme.  I think 
> you also would agree with me that if it had been ten variables and an exported 
> function then it should live in a separate .c file in the summit specific code.

Yup.
 
> If you can promise me that summit will never need an extra variable or 
> exported function as the code evolves from now until the end of the 
> architecture then I can live with summit_x86 in the main line.

I don't think it'll ever need it, but if it does, I'll create it ;-)

M.