Re: [RFC] Rename _bh to _softirq

[Maksim]

At 10:44 AM 10/15/2002 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: "Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy" <[e-mail]>
>    Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:34:02 -0700
>
>    But primary interface should be changed IMO.
>
>I totally disagree.
Care to explain why ?

>Keep _bh, it's cool.
But pretty much meaningless. _softirq on the other hand clearly shows what 
it does.
We don't give names to a functions based on the coolness, do we ? ;-)

btw _si would be equally cool.

Max