Re: [PATCH] [8/7] oprofile - dcookies need to use u32

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:38:43 -0700 (PDT)


From: John Levon <levon@movementarian.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:40:57 +0100

I'm not sure that's an option :

o userspace needs to know the size of the cookie in the event buffer
o userspace would like to use the cookie as a hash value to avoid
repeated lookups

Perhaps the best solution would be to use a separate u32 ID value,
allocated linearly. I could just refuse to allocate new dcookies in
theoretical case of overflow.

The other possibility is a dcookiefs (cat
/dev/oprofile/dcookie/34343234) but that's a lot of extra
code/complexity ...

I don't understand why using a bigger type is not an option.

Why not just use u64? That would work too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/