Re: [PATCH][RFC] 2.5.42: remove capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) check from

Olaf Dietsche (olaf.dietsche#list.linux-kernel@t-online.de)
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:00:24 +0200


Olaf Dietsche <olaf.dietsche#list.linux-kernel@t-online.de> writes:

> In drivers/char/mem.c there's open_port(), which is used as open_mem()
> and open_kmem() as well. I don't see the benefit of this, since
> /dev/mem and /dev/kmem are already protected by filesystem
> permissions.
>
> mem.c, line 526:
> static int open_port(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
> {
> return capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ? 0 : -EPERM;
> }
>
> If anyone knows, why this is done this way, please let me
> know. Otherwise, I suggest the patch below.

I haven't got a convincing answer against this patch, so far. The
patch applies to 2.5.43 as well.
Linus, please apply.

Regards, Olaf.

--- a/drivers/char/mem.c Sat Oct 5 18:44:55 2002
+++ b/drivers/char/mem.c Sun Oct 13 13:59:25 2002
@@ -533,15 +533,12 @@
#define full_lseek null_lseek
#define write_zero write_null
#define read_full read_zero
-#define open_mem open_port
-#define open_kmem open_mem

static struct file_operations mem_fops = {
llseek: memory_lseek,
read: read_mem,
write: write_mem,
mmap: mmap_mem,
- open: open_mem,
};

static struct file_operations kmem_fops = {
@@ -549,7 +546,6 @@
read: read_kmem,
write: write_kmem,
mmap: mmap_kmem,
- open: open_kmem,
};

static struct file_operations null_fops = {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/